Rollbit's licence record, and what could not be confirmed
Bull Gaming N.V., company 157086, Curaçao. Licence OGL/2024/1260/0494, unresolved in every register queried. The restricted-territory clause in full.
Written by Emerson Pike/Read 2026-08-28
This page carries everything establishable about the operator behind Rollbit, from one document: the Terms and Conditions of Service, revision dated 31 January 2025, read on 28 August 2026. It also carries what could not be established, at the same length, because on this subject the failed checks are as informative as the successful ones.
The terms name the operator as Bull Gaming N.V., company number 157086, incorporated in Curaçao at Zuikertuintjeweg Z/N, the Zuikertuin Tower. They state that the company is permitted to operate and offer games of chance under its valid licence OGL/2024/1260/0494. The word valid there is the operator's own word about itself, which is normal in a terms document and is not evidence either way. How that record sits beside the alternatives is on the Rollbit alternatives comparison, and what the same terms say about documents and withdrawals is on the limits page.
Two registers were queried. Neither confirmed the licence, and the reasons are different enough to be worth separating.
The Curaçao register: unresolved, not invalid
On 28 August 2026 the Curaçao Gaming Authority's certificate register returned no result for every domain queried against it. Not only Rollbit — the same nothing came back for brands whose Curaçao licences are not in any doubt, including ones that hold current certificates. A register that answers nothing to everything is proof in neither direction.
So OGL/2024/1260/0494 is recorded here as unresolved. Not confirmed, not disputed, not invalid. The distinction is the whole point of the page: a site that reported its own failed lookup as a failed licence check would be publishing the state of its tooling and calling it a finding about an operator.
This is not a limitation this site can engineer around, and it applies equally to the twenty-two Curaçao-family brands in the register. Where a brand publishes a certificate identifier rather than relying on a domain search, the lookup does still resolve, and thirty-nine of the forty-two publish a link or identifier of some kind.
| Field | As published |
|---|---|
| Operating company | Bull Gaming N.V. |
| Company number | 157086 |
| Incorporated in | Curaçao |
| Registered address | Zuikertuintjeweg Z/N (Zuikertuin Tower), Curaçao |
| Licence authority | Curaçao |
| Licence number | OGL/2024/1260/0494 |
| Register result | Unresolved — no result returned for any domain queried |
| Anjouan endpoint | Not licensed by the Anjouan authority, checked 2026-08-27 |
| Terms revision | 31 January 2025 |
| Minimum age | 18 |
Terms and Conditions of Service, read 2026-08-28. The Anjouan check was run for completeness and returned the expected negative.
The Anjouan check, and why a negative was recorded
The Anjouan Gaming Board's validation endpoint does answer. Queried against rollbit.com on 27 August 2026, it returned not licensed by the Anjouan authority.
That is exactly what the terms predict, since they name Curaçao and never mention Anjouan. The negative is recorded not because it is surprising but because an unrecorded check and an unrun check look identical six months later, and the difference between them is the difference between evidence and a gap.
Seventeen brands in this register do hold Anjouan licences, in the ALSI- format, and for those the endpoint is the one licence check on this site that produces a real answer rather than a shrug.
The restricted-territory clause, in full
Rollbit's Jurisdiction and Restricted Territories clause names twenty-nine entries. It is reproduced here in the order the terms print them, on this page and nowhere else on the site, because it is a term of Rollbit's own contract and the single most common reason someone goes looking for an alternative in the first place.
The same clause reserves the right to refuse customers from any other country, and notes that particular third-party provider games are unavailable in some countries for licensing reasons. So the list is a floor rather than a ceiling: it is what the document commits to, not the limit of what the operator may do.
This site does not carry that argument across to the forty-two alternatives, does not discuss any country's gambling law, and does not tell anyone how to present themselves as being somewhere they are not. Where an operator's terms treat masking a location as a breach, that is the operator's clause and this site will not advise around it.
- Afghanistan, Aruba, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Bonaire, Curacao, Cyprus, Denmark, Estonia, France, Germany, Hungary, Iran, Iraq, Italy, Netherlands, North Korea, Saba, Slovakia, Spain, St Maarten, Statia, Sweden, Turkey, Ukraine, United Kingdom, United Arab Emirates, and the U.S.A or the U.S.A dependencies.
Three clauses about money, stated plainly
Deposited sums are not refundable. That is the document's own wording, and it is worth reading twice, because a deposit made in error is governed by it as much as a deposit made deliberately.
Deposited funds are held separately from the operator's own operational funds, but the terms give no guarantee that they would be recoverable in an insolvency. Segregation and protection are not the same commitment, and this document makes the first without making the second.
Deposit limits are discretionary: minimums and maximums may be set by deposit method, by account and gameplay history, by limits you set yourself, or by the operator's sole discretion. Combined with the absence of any published withdrawal ceiling, the practical position is that no figure in this relationship is fixed by the contract.
What this page is not
It is not a claim that Rollbit is unlicensed. It is a record of two register queries, one of which returned nothing to everyone and one of which returned the expected negative for an authority Rollbit never claimed.
It is not legal advice about any territory on the restricted list. Gambling law differs by country, changes, and is enforced differently in each; that is a question for a qualified adviser and not for a comparison site.
And it is not based on anything tested with money. No account was opened, no deposit made and no withdrawal timed, at Rollbit, at any of the Rollbit alternatives or anywhere else on this site.
Questions people actually ask
- Is Rollbit licensed?
Its terms name a Curaçao licence, OGL/2024/1260/0494, and describe it as valid. We could not resolve that number: the Curaçao certificate register returned no result for any domain queried on 2026-08-28, including brands with undisputed licences. The record here says unresolved, which is the only thing the evidence supports.
- Who operates Rollbit?
Bull Gaming N.V., company number 157086, incorporated in Curaçao at Zuikertuintjeweg Z/N (Zuikertuin Tower), according to the opening paragraph of its own terms.
- Which countries do Rollbit's terms exclude?
Twenty-nine are named in the Jurisdiction and Restricted Territories clause, listed in full above. The same clause reserves the right to refuse customers from any other country, so the list is a floor rather than a complete answer.
- Does Rollbit publish a withdrawal limit?
No. The terms make withdrawal conditional on identity and anti-money-laundering checks completed to the operator's satisfaction, and publish no maximum. Deposit limits are described as discretionary.